IB Exam Criteria

IB Exam Criteria Explained: Markbands, Command Terms & Assessment

IB assessment is criterion-referenced: examiners judge work against published descriptors, not against other students. This page breaks down how criteria, markbands, command terms and grade boundaries work across DP, CP and MYP subjects and core components so you can align revision and coursework with what examiners actually assess.

Read the FAQs

How IB Exam Criteria Work

  1. Criterion-referenced, not norm-referencedExaminers judge work against published descriptors, not against other students.
  2. Assessment objectives drive every paperEvery IB subject uses a set of assessment objectives that define the skills and knowledge examiners look for.
  3. Markbands describe performance levelsEach objective is measured through criteria with level descriptors called markbands.
  4. Raw criterion marks sum to subject totalMarks from each criterion are added to give a subject total.
  5. Grade boundaries set each sessionThe subject total is converted to the 1–7 grade using session-specific grade boundaries.

Command Terms and What They Require

Command terms tell you the depth and type of response expected. They are grouped by cognitive demand: from recall (state, list) through understanding (describe, explain) to analysis and evaluation (analyse, evaluate, discuss, to what extent). Using the wrong depth for a term is a common reason marks are lost even when content knowledge is solid.

Criteria by Subject Group

Sciences: knowledge, inquiry, communication, reflectionMathematics: knowledge, problem-solving, communication, technologyIndividuals & Societies: knowledge, concepts, skills, critical thinkingLanguage Acquisition: language, message, concepts, text analysisLanguage & Literature: language, message, concepts, text analysisArts: knowledge, process, communication, reflection

Internal Assessment Criteria

📝

Teacher-marked, IB-moderated

Internal Assessments are marked by teachers using subject-specific criteria, then moderated by the IB to align standards across schools.

🔍

Criteria include process and reflection

Criteria often mirror exam objectives but add dimensions such as personal engagement, exploration design or mathematical communication.

⚠️

Not a simple content checklist

Common pitfalls include treating criteria as a checklist, insufficient reflection, and not addressing the highest markband descriptors.

🎯

Personal engagement often assessed

Many IA criteria include personal engagement or exploration design as explicit descriptors.

🌍

Moderation adjusts to global standard

IB moderation ensures teacher marks align with a global standard across all schools.

Core Component Criteria: TOK, EE, CAS

TOK essay and exhibition

Theory of Knowledge uses two criteria: the essay (knowledge questions, arguments, perspectives) and the exhibition (objects, links to prompts, justification).

Extended Essay criteria

The Extended Essay is assessed on five criteria: focus and method, knowledge and understanding, critical thinking, presentation, and engagement.

CAS learning outcomes

CAS is not graded 1–7; it requires evidence of seven learning outcomes across creativity, activity and service, plus a portfolio and reflections.

Core points matrix

Core points are awarded via the TOK/EE matrix, combining performance in both components.

Different from subject criteria

Core component criteria assess distinct skills — argumentation, research, reflection — separate from subject-specific assessment objectives.

From Criteria to Grade Boundaries

1

Boundaries set per subject per session

After all papers and IAs are marked, the IB sets grade boundaries for each subject in that session.

2

Convert summed marks to 1–7 grades

Boundaries convert the summed criterion marks into the 1–7 scale.

3

Shift slightly to maintain standards

They shift slightly each session to maintain comparable standards.

4

Use past boundaries as rough guides

Knowing typical boundary ranges helps you set realistic target marks for each criterion during revision.

5

Target marks per criterion in revision

Set specific mark targets for each criterion rather than only aiming for a final grade.

MYP Criteria and eAssessment

MYP subjects use four criteria (A–D) per subject group, each with eight achievement levels. The Personal Project is assessed on three criteria: planning, applying skills, and reflecting. eAssessment includes on-screen examinations and ePortfolios; both use the same subject criteria but add requirements for digital submission and time-limited tasks. In November, MYP5 students often begin cumulative revision while advancing the Personal Project report and, where applicable, preparing for ePortfolio and on-screen components.

Using Criteria to Guide Revision

🔗

Link questions to command terms and criteria

Map each past-paper question to its command term and the criterion it targets.

📊

Mark work against published markbands

After marking, note which markband your response reached and which descriptor was missing.

🎯

Identify missing descriptors per criterion

Build revision sessions around the weakest criteria first.

📈

Prioritise weakest criteria in revision

Focus study time on criteria where descriptors are consistently not met.

📋

Read examiner reports for markband examples

Use examiner reports to see how markbands were applied in recent sessions.

Common Misconceptions About IB Criteria

  1. Criteria describe quality, not content listsCriteria are not content checklists; they describe quality of thinking.
  2. Past boundaries are not fixed targetsGrade boundaries from past years are not fixed targets for the current session.
  3. Command terms require specific depthCommand terms are not interchangeable; each demands a specific depth.
  4. IA criteria differ from exam criteriaInternal Assessment criteria differ from exam paper criteria in several subjects.
  5. CAS uses learning outcomes, not 1–7CAS is not assessed on a 1–7 scale. Treating any of these as interchangeable leads to misdirected effort.

FAQ

Are IB criteria the same for every subject?

The structure of four criteria (A–D) is common, but the focus of each criterion changes by subject group to match the discipline's skills.

How do command terms affect my marks?

Each command term signals the depth of response required. Answering an 'evaluate' question with only description will not reach the higher markbands.

Do grade boundaries change every exam session?

Yes, boundaries are set per subject per session to maintain comparable standards, so they shift slightly each time.

How is the Personal Project assessed in MYP?

It uses three criteria: planning, applying skills, and reflecting, each with eight achievement levels.

Is CAS graded on the 1–7 scale?

No. CAS requires evidence of seven learning outcomes across creativity, activity and service, plus a portfolio and reflections.

Want help aligning your revision to IB criteria?

Our tutors work with the published markbands and command terms to target the criteria where you can gain the most marks. Submit the consultation form to get started.